“Look at how Bush had operated as president of the Texas Rangers baseball club, they said. Bush let the managers manage the team and the financial guys run the business. He spent his time making sure the political coalition to support the Texas Rangers in the style to which it wanted to be accustomed remained stable. Bush knows his strengths and weaknesses, they told me. He will focus on being Americaâ€™s Queen Elizabeth II, and will let people like Colin Powell and Paul Oâ€™Neill be Americaâ€™s Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.
“By the summer of 2001, it had become clear that something had gone very wrong. By that point, Bush had rejected Oâ€™Neillâ€™s and Christine Todd Whitmanâ€™s advice on environmental policy, just as he had rejected Alan Greenspanâ€™s and Oâ€™Neillâ€™s advice on fiscal policy, Powellâ€™s and Condoleezza Riceâ€™s advice on the importance of pushing forward on negotiations between Israel and Palestine, and â€“ as we learned later â€“ George Tenetâ€™s and Richard Clarkeâ€™s advice about the importance of counterterrorism.
“A strange picture of Bush emerged from conversations with sub-cabinet administration appointees, their friends, and their friends of friends. He was not just under-briefed, but also lazy: he insisted on remaining under-briefed. He was not just incurious, but also arrogant: he insisted on making uninformed decisions, and hence made decisions that were essentially random. And he was stubborn: once he had made a decision â€“ even, or rather especially, if it was glaringly wrong and stupid â€“ he would never revisit it.
“So, by the summer of 2001, a pattern was set that would lead British observer Daniel Davies to ask if there was a Bush administration policy on anything of even moderate importance that had not been completely bollixed up. But if you relied on either the Washington Post or the New York Times, you would have had a very hard time seeing it. Today, it is an accepted fact that the kindest thing you can say about the Bush administration is that it is completely incompetent, which is the line now taken by hard-line Bush supporters like the National Review and the commentator Robert Novak.
“Why didnâ€™t the American press corps cover the Bush administration properly for its first five years? I really do not know. I do know that the world cannot afford to rely again on Americaâ€™s press for its information: fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. So I appeal to all of you working for newspapers, radio, and television stations outside the United States: it is to you that we â€“ including those of us in America â€“ must look to discover what our own government is doing.”
While America’s Watch Dogs Slept…, Brad DeLong, May 5, 2007 (via RB)
I need to read Brad more often.